New Moves

Amy and I are in the process of closing on a new house. That means that the journey of home renovation and automation I undertook on our townhouse will start again, but on a larger scale. I learned a lot of lessons from when we bought our townhouse and I automated it, and will be applying some of those lessons from teh setup and “living with” the technology to the new place.

A few key differences:

The new home is a newer construction single story ranch style house. Our current home is mid ’60’s vintage and four stories.

Infrastructure in the new place is updated (power, etc).

So, as I start planning, here are some thoughts:

  • IPads - In our current house, I put a 15″ Planar touch screen on the wall. That unit was $399.00 dollars retail, and I got ours for $349.00. This was hooked to a Mac Mini hidden in the wall. With the iPad, I can have a floating touch panel around the house that could do more than the 15″ and yet costs not much more.
  • Power, temperature, etc - I want to MRTG up our house, meaning track analytics on things like temperature in the attic space, outside, power consumption, bandwidth in/out. If anyone knows of a good method of doing this for power and temp through IP, let me know.
  • Wireless - I’m debating whether to run antennas into a central duct that goes through the house, or use Power over Ethernet to put the whole access point in the duct? The house is rather long (ranch style), so I need 2-3 non-relayed Wireless N access points for good, even coverage.
  • Thermostat and Sprinklers - I’m going to use Insteon capable thermostat and sprinkler controllers. It will be pretty cool.
  • Security System - The house has a security system. I’m going to try to figure out if its possible to tap into it (like the window open sensors, etc) to the Mac.
  • Cameras - Any input on how to do IP cameras in an inconspicuous manner, without having to do insane cable routing? Are there any cameras that can tap into 110v?
  • Sonos - its a good bet we’ll be using a lot of Sonos product to audio up the place.
  • Phone System - I’m looking to use a hosted PBX with IP phones. Possibly from OneCall.com. Any input on good phones for this?

Stay tuned. Lots planned!

Perspective

Lets compare:

Logitech Harmony

201004090915.jpg

$399.00

Performs tasks related to the macro management of home entertainment gear with a three and a half inch capacitive display.

201004090918.jpg

Phillips Pronto TSU9800

$1,695.00

6.4″ VGA display with optical rotary wheel and WiFi support. Capacitive touch screen display.

201004090919.jpg

Phillips TSU9400

3.5 inch capacitive touch screen display. Works with Windows MCE!

$794.99

201004090920.jpg

Apple iPad

$499.00 to $829.00

General purpose computing device. 3,500 dedicated and 150,000 compatible apps and counting.

Thoughts after a day of use

These are some loose thoughts on the first day with the iPad

1. It presents the possibility of a future with devices that live with you instead of around you. It is a far more visceral experience to use this device than a laptop.
2. This will not replace my laptop. My 17″ Macbook Pro is an extension of my desktop. It is a machine for work and engineering. This is a machine for lIving with.
3. It is telling that the OS is version 3.2 even though 3.5 would have made more sense. It seems Apple is saying through a version number that thee software is in a state of potentia. The sdk points to a lot of half done features, like shared file access.
4. Last night I left the device with my parents. They read a story from iBook to my son, surfed the web and played games. They will be getting a 3G one, and I have a feeling maybe two. It took em about a minute to figure the device out.
5. As an engineer of media products, this is an exciting thing indeed. Newspapers however should think more about modeless innovation and less about atomic device specific innovation. One device does not beget a reinvention of a dying model.

The iPad, what else?

The iPad hype trajectory is exactly as I anticipated. It was a lot of gasping on release, followed by a lot of shit talking, leading up to anticipation and hype and ultimately extremely high market success. Why did it follow this trajectory? Apple designed it to be. They seem to be the only company out there that does innovation through exclusion and feature absentia.

The question is: why are they the only one?

It takes a good conviction of character, brand identity, and a hell of a balance sheet to be able to take gambles like the iPad. A device that does not go to where the market is, but stands on the side and waits very patiently for everyone to come to it. Look at the Flash/HTML5 war that Apple decided to start. They did that willingly, to force various hands in their favor. If no one had switched video to HTML5 and Adobe double-downed on exclusivity, would Apple have bended on Flash? No. If they could get away with no Flash on OSX I’m sure they would. If they could include Click-To-Flash by default without DOJ issues I’m sure they would too.

Apple to me, and maybe a few other companies (BMW, Facebook) seems to be the only company who is willing to put a stake in the ground and not move it no matter how hard it is pushed.

And people wonder why other businesses are in trouble.

Thumb Regions

photo.jpg

I made a 1:1 scale cardboard iPad to start thinking about ways we can use it for artists and music in general. Some of the findings from playing with it on this scale are that interactivity on the device is really going to come down to what you do with one or both thumb regions in every orientation.

I traced my thumb boundaries in both orientations here and it will be interesting to see what developers do with these primary interactive regions, especially with gaming. I can imagine main controls on the left or right thumb, with contextual controls for your other hand and directional through accelerometer.

A lot of possibilities for sure.

Me at SXSW

Two videos surfaced of me speaking on a panel about musicians and social networking. I focused a lot on artists owning their own data:

One line descriptions

Fastest, perfect, revolutionizes, complete, powerful, comprehensive, affordable, funnest, smallest, thinnest advanced.
[From Apple - Public Relations - Products]

We all have a lot of big ideas. Big ideas that could be transformative. I have a lot of big ideas that I view as being transformative to my industry.

What the challenge is is communicating those big ideas in a way that is indeed transformative.

Our mode of conveyance is variable: text, images, powerpoints, video. The struggle for information transmission is documented and known, parodied and lauded, and more often than not, for the innovators, difficult.

I struggle with it constantly. To explain something that took me a year to make in six words is near impossible. You want to shout about all the features, the capabilities, the subtleties and the geek qualities.

Take a look at the page Apple has on their media info site however, where they show product info for all their products. Take a look then at the single sentence product descriptions.

iMac – “The all-in-one for everyone.”

Logic Express – “Advanced music creation. Affordable price.”

Mac OSX – “The world’s most advanced OS”

Apple Keyboard – “The new ultra-thin aluminum Apple Keyboard”

iPod touch – “The funnest iPod ever”

I have no doubt a ton of thought went into those descriptions, but it’s telling that Apple actually put the thought in in the first place. Try to find a page like this on Dell, Microsoft, or Sony. You can’t.

I think the key difference is that Apple built products that could be summarized in one sentence.

Compare a Dell U2711 (I have two, I love them) with a Cinema Display:

Experience remarkable color accuracy, precision and performance with the Dell UltraSharpTM U2711 27”W Monitor with PremierColor technology.”

vs.

“Big ideas need a big canvas”

Of those, which conveys desire for purchase?

I think the lesson here is that as we engineers and geeks build things, build not toward the feature list but toward the one sentence description.

The vision of clarity and purpose through the economy of language.