The Classic Rock Magazine Is Switching to a Smaller, Rack-Friendly Size - NYTimes.com

Question here is: why don’t they switch to a smaller, more web-friendly site? Why is that so hard for publishing companies to get: your sites suck.

[From The Classic Rock Magazine Is Switching to a Smaller, Rack-Friendly Size - NYTimes.com]

Comments 2

  1. Todd wrote:

    Man, it’s gonna be tricky for me to roll blunts on that smaller format. :(

    Posted 13 Aug 2008 at 7:55 am
  2. iwqsxzl xdwjcg wrote:

    xgipnbqh phizoelna oibykz sbtrucz hyxaom bezuynsvd krux

    Posted 11 Sep 2008 at 6:38 am

Post a Comment

Your email is never published nor shared. Required fields are marked *