http://blackrimglasses.com/archives/2008/07/24/music-tax-because-cocaine-doesn%e2%80%99t-buy-itself/ Music + Technology + Random Nonsense from the Music Industry Fri, 21 Nov 2008 09:00:13 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7-bleeding http://blackrimglasses.com/archives/2008/07/24/music-tax-because-cocaine-doesn%e2%80%99t-buy-itself/#comment-191443 Ethan Thu, 24 Jul 2008 19:45:55 +0000 http://blackrimglasses.com/archives/2008/07/24/music-tax-because-cocaine-doesn%e2%80%99t-buy-itself/#comment-191443 substantive content gets discourse, in-substantive content is just a traffic ploy. if you're not adding to the discourse, why bother? substantive content gets discourse, in-substantive content is just a traffic ploy. if you’re not adding to the discourse, why bother?

]]> http://blackrimglasses.com/archives/2008/07/24/music-tax-because-cocaine-doesn%e2%80%99t-buy-itself/#comment-191442 Stan Schroeder Thu, 24 Jul 2008 19:05:15 +0000 http://blackrimglasses.com/archives/2008/07/24/music-tax-because-cocaine-doesn%e2%80%99t-buy-itself/#comment-191442 I won't argue the notion that I don't know jack shit about the subject. (; That's your opinion. But I will argue the notion that I'm writing about this particular subject to get traffic. That's insane. I write about it because I find it interesting. Tackling subjects such as this one perhaps induces a lot of comments, many negative ones too, but it doesn't bring any extra traffic. I won’t argue the notion that I don’t know jack shit about the subject. (; That’s your opinion. But I will argue the notion that I’m writing about this particular subject to get traffic. That’s insane. I write about it because I find it interesting. Tackling subjects such as this one perhaps induces a lot of comments, many negative ones too, but it doesn’t bring any extra traffic.

]]>